Monday, April 24, 2006
New homeless stories:
Monday, April 10, 2006
Need to Increase Welfare Rates
HI everyone out in povnet land. Here’s some info on the “Shoe-In” that we held at Carnegie Centre to try to get some coverage for the need to increase welfare rates and end the barriers that keep people in need from getting welfare. We did get some media (Georgia Straight, Metro, 24 hrs, Global TV, Fairchild, CKNW) but nothing in the Sun, Province, CBC, Globe and Mail, etc. so I’m trying to make this our own media coverage. The actual event was a lot of fun and involved a lot of Downtown Eastside residents. - Jean Swanson
Carole Taylor “Shoe-In” a big success
When Finance Minister Carol Taylor introduced the provincial budget last month, she wore new $600 Gucci shoes. Six hundred dollars is $90 more than a single person gets in a month on welfare. There was no increase to welfare rates in the budget even though there’s a $2 billion surplus. Like many other people, Jaya Babu and Diane Wood were appalled by Carole Taylor’s arrogance and blindness—flaunting $600 shoes while thousand of British Columbians live in deep poverty. They began to talk about shoes, and how they might be used as an expression of resistance to injustice. Then others at Carnegie joined in the conversation and began to create an event. They had the confidence to do this. They had the faith—faith as creating what we do not see. And the Carole Taylor “Shoe-In” was born. There would be a large, golden shoe representing Carole Taylor’s $600 shoes (thank you, Miriam), and there would be $600 worth of food to give to hungry people (thank you, BCGEU, BCTF, BC Fed, CUPE 391, Michael and Diane Goldberg, CCPA staff and Andrea Ottem).
The event took place on March 28th at 11 am in the Carnegie theatre, and the Carnegie was buzzing. Lots of media showed up, and the “Shoe-In” was ready for them. The event was designed as a teach-in to teach Carole Taylor some facts about poverty in BC. She didn't show up, but Libby Davies, our Member of Parliament, and Jenny Kwan, our Member of the Legislative Assembly, were there. Professor Bob Sarti presided over the teach-in, and he did an excellent job. Mary Ann Cantillon (thanks, Mary Ann and Sharon for the costume) was Mary Ann Antoinette and she repeated that famous phrase, “Let them eat cake.” Then delicious cake (thanks Katrina) was served to people in the theatre.
Jean Swanson gave a talk on why welfare rates should go up. Then Prof. Bob asked us to answer the question, “How do people on welfare get by in a 5-week month?” Downtown Eastside residents in the audience responded with many answers and Diane Wood wrote them down. The answers will be sent to Carole Taylor. Some of the answers to the questions were: use food banks; use free food outlets; beg in the streets, go binning; sleep a lot; prostitution; end up in hospital, and many more.
Seth Klein of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) spun the Wheel of Misfortune. This wheel had the many barriers to welfare on it, and it showed how difficult it was to get welfare in BC. Then Seth talked about a new CCPA report that showed that the drop in the number of people getting welfare in BC is due to the new welfare rules, and is not because more people on welfare found work. Seth said welfare rates should be raised by 50 percent, and the money to do this was there because the government had a two billion dollar surplus.
Then Prof. Bob asked the audience what it would do with the government’s $2 B surplus. There were many answers to this question, and Diane wrote them down. They will be sent to Carole Taylor. Some of the answers were: increase welfare rates; build social housing; a dental program for people on welfare; more treatment centres and harm reduction programs for drug users; opening up Riverview so mentally ill people aren't on the streets, and many more.
Adrienne Montani from First Call gave a strong talk on the needs of poor children and poor families in BC. She said there is more child poverty in BC than in any other province. She said that the gap between rich and poor is increasing, and that those poverty facts are known to government. Yet the government turns away from the crisis of poverty. “Why does it do that?” Adrienne asked. Why do the rich turn their backs on the poor? Then there was a parade of shoes—not Gucci shoes—and a class photo on the front steps of Carnegie. After that, the $600 worth of food was distributed to people who were hungry after a five week welfare month.
The “Shoe-In” was a great success. There was a lot of energy in the Carnegie Theatre. Congratulations to the many people who worked hard to make this event inspiring, informative and lots of fun. Hopefully, some of that energy will spill over to the Raise the Rates Campaign. In her speech Jean Swanson quoted Nelson Mandela, “Like slavery and apartheid, poverty is not natural. It is man-made and can be overcome and eradicated by the actions of human beings.” --Sandy Cameron
Here’s a copy of the talk I gave at the Shoe-In, in case there’s anything in it that might be useful to anyone fighting for higher rates: Shoe-in talk March 28, 2006 I remember what this neighbourhood was like 25 years ago. It was poor. It had drug users and people with illness and disabilities. But hardly anyone was homeless. Most people had enough to eat. No one slept in the pews at First United. The stores weren’t boarded up.
Why was it different then? In those days welfare and minimum wages had more purchasing power. People could afford to rent a room, buy a sandwich at a cheap restaurant, have a cup of coffee with a friend, and get a bus pass or a phone. Now the welfare rate for a single person is $510 a month. How many voters who aren't poor actually realize that welfare rates are so abysmally low? How many know that the $510 is divided into 2 parts. $325 is for shelter. How many people who aren't poor know that the $325 has been frozen for 14 years or that the average rent for a crummy hotel room is $380? How many people who aren't poor know that the support portion of welfare is $185? How many know that it was $205 a month in 1981, 25 years ago?
How many middle class or rich people or members of the legislature would have the budgeting skills to even survive on $510 a month, let alone stay healthy and look for work? Think of what you could buy if you got $852 a month for welfare. That’s what welfare you’d get today if welfare had the same purchasing power that it had 25 years ago.
Why are people in this neighbourhood so sick, so hungry, so depressed? Because provincial government policies have created a deep, deep poverty in the midst of incredible wealth.
That’s why Carole Taylor’s shoes made us angry—shoes that cost $90 more than a single person on welfare has to live on for a month. She had a $2 billion budget surplus. She could have ended the deep, deep poverty and the hardship it creates. She could have helped open the stores in our community and in low income neighbourhoods across the province. But she didn't. The government didn't. Instead she bought the Guccis—the shoes that say, “if you’re poor you don't count”--the shoes that say being rich in the midst of deep, deep poverty is normal. But, as Nelson Mandela said, “Like slavery and apartheid, poverty is not natural. It is man-made, and can be overcome and eradicated by the actions of human beings.” That’s what we expect the governments we elect to do. We’re getting allies and we’re not going to stop til those welfare rates get raised.
And here’s a poem written by M. Kelly at Carnegie: $600 could have bought…
*A wheelchair for my dear wife so I could push her when she’s in too much pain to walk (a retiree)
*milk for my kids for a year (mother of four)
*Almost 300 bus tickets for my job search rides (young immigrants)
*Tune-up for old beater that gets us to work each day (Mr+Mrs working poor)
*Laser surgery for cataracts in both eyes (senior)
*Steel-toed boots and a hard hat so I could get a construction job (young man)
*150 jars of jam to go with my peanut butter sandwiches (school girl)
*I could get my prescriptions filled (senior citizen)
*600 presents from the Dollar Store so I’d always have gifts for my family (a “training” wage earner)
*Bannock to feed all the hungry tummies, and blankets for the winter (an elder)
*Decent clothes for my children to wear to school so no one laughs at them (single mom)
*Dinner for 200 people at Union Gospel Mission at Easter (homeless person)
*Brushes and paint (a starving artist)
*600 boxes of Kraft Dinner (a young mom)
*Comfortable shoes for the next 10 years for our poor, tired feet (taxpaying public)
Instead our $600 became some ugly shoes abandoned in a rich woman’s closet.
--M. Kelly Jean Swanson
Carole Taylor “Shoe-In” a big success
When Finance Minister Carol Taylor introduced the provincial budget last month, she wore new $600 Gucci shoes. Six hundred dollars is $90 more than a single person gets in a month on welfare. There was no increase to welfare rates in the budget even though there’s a $2 billion surplus. Like many other people, Jaya Babu and Diane Wood were appalled by Carole Taylor’s arrogance and blindness—flaunting $600 shoes while thousand of British Columbians live in deep poverty. They began to talk about shoes, and how they might be used as an expression of resistance to injustice. Then others at Carnegie joined in the conversation and began to create an event. They had the confidence to do this. They had the faith—faith as creating what we do not see. And the Carole Taylor “Shoe-In” was born. There would be a large, golden shoe representing Carole Taylor’s $600 shoes (thank you, Miriam), and there would be $600 worth of food to give to hungry people (thank you, BCGEU, BCTF, BC Fed, CUPE 391, Michael and Diane Goldberg, CCPA staff and Andrea Ottem).
The event took place on March 28th at 11 am in the Carnegie theatre, and the Carnegie was buzzing. Lots of media showed up, and the “Shoe-In” was ready for them. The event was designed as a teach-in to teach Carole Taylor some facts about poverty in BC. She didn't show up, but Libby Davies, our Member of Parliament, and Jenny Kwan, our Member of the Legislative Assembly, were there. Professor Bob Sarti presided over the teach-in, and he did an excellent job. Mary Ann Cantillon (thanks, Mary Ann and Sharon for the costume) was Mary Ann Antoinette and she repeated that famous phrase, “Let them eat cake.” Then delicious cake (thanks Katrina) was served to people in the theatre.
Jean Swanson gave a talk on why welfare rates should go up. Then Prof. Bob asked us to answer the question, “How do people on welfare get by in a 5-week month?” Downtown Eastside residents in the audience responded with many answers and Diane Wood wrote them down. The answers will be sent to Carole Taylor. Some of the answers to the questions were: use food banks; use free food outlets; beg in the streets, go binning; sleep a lot; prostitution; end up in hospital, and many more.
Seth Klein of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) spun the Wheel of Misfortune. This wheel had the many barriers to welfare on it, and it showed how difficult it was to get welfare in BC. Then Seth talked about a new CCPA report that showed that the drop in the number of people getting welfare in BC is due to the new welfare rules, and is not because more people on welfare found work. Seth said welfare rates should be raised by 50 percent, and the money to do this was there because the government had a two billion dollar surplus.
Then Prof. Bob asked the audience what it would do with the government’s $2 B surplus. There were many answers to this question, and Diane wrote them down. They will be sent to Carole Taylor. Some of the answers were: increase welfare rates; build social housing; a dental program for people on welfare; more treatment centres and harm reduction programs for drug users; opening up Riverview so mentally ill people aren't on the streets, and many more.
Adrienne Montani from First Call gave a strong talk on the needs of poor children and poor families in BC. She said there is more child poverty in BC than in any other province. She said that the gap between rich and poor is increasing, and that those poverty facts are known to government. Yet the government turns away from the crisis of poverty. “Why does it do that?” Adrienne asked. Why do the rich turn their backs on the poor? Then there was a parade of shoes—not Gucci shoes—and a class photo on the front steps of Carnegie. After that, the $600 worth of food was distributed to people who were hungry after a five week welfare month.
The “Shoe-In” was a great success. There was a lot of energy in the Carnegie Theatre. Congratulations to the many people who worked hard to make this event inspiring, informative and lots of fun. Hopefully, some of that energy will spill over to the Raise the Rates Campaign. In her speech Jean Swanson quoted Nelson Mandela, “Like slavery and apartheid, poverty is not natural. It is man-made and can be overcome and eradicated by the actions of human beings.” --Sandy Cameron
Here’s a copy of the talk I gave at the Shoe-In, in case there’s anything in it that might be useful to anyone fighting for higher rates: Shoe-in talk March 28, 2006 I remember what this neighbourhood was like 25 years ago. It was poor. It had drug users and people with illness and disabilities. But hardly anyone was homeless. Most people had enough to eat. No one slept in the pews at First United. The stores weren’t boarded up.
Why was it different then? In those days welfare and minimum wages had more purchasing power. People could afford to rent a room, buy a sandwich at a cheap restaurant, have a cup of coffee with a friend, and get a bus pass or a phone. Now the welfare rate for a single person is $510 a month. How many voters who aren't poor actually realize that welfare rates are so abysmally low? How many know that the $510 is divided into 2 parts. $325 is for shelter. How many people who aren't poor know that the $325 has been frozen for 14 years or that the average rent for a crummy hotel room is $380? How many people who aren't poor know that the support portion of welfare is $185? How many know that it was $205 a month in 1981, 25 years ago?
How many middle class or rich people or members of the legislature would have the budgeting skills to even survive on $510 a month, let alone stay healthy and look for work? Think of what you could buy if you got $852 a month for welfare. That’s what welfare you’d get today if welfare had the same purchasing power that it had 25 years ago.
Why are people in this neighbourhood so sick, so hungry, so depressed? Because provincial government policies have created a deep, deep poverty in the midst of incredible wealth.
That’s why Carole Taylor’s shoes made us angry—shoes that cost $90 more than a single person on welfare has to live on for a month. She had a $2 billion budget surplus. She could have ended the deep, deep poverty and the hardship it creates. She could have helped open the stores in our community and in low income neighbourhoods across the province. But she didn't. The government didn't. Instead she bought the Guccis—the shoes that say, “if you’re poor you don't count”--the shoes that say being rich in the midst of deep, deep poverty is normal. But, as Nelson Mandela said, “Like slavery and apartheid, poverty is not natural. It is man-made, and can be overcome and eradicated by the actions of human beings.” That’s what we expect the governments we elect to do. We’re getting allies and we’re not going to stop til those welfare rates get raised.
And here’s a poem written by M. Kelly at Carnegie: $600 could have bought…
*A wheelchair for my dear wife so I could push her when she’s in too much pain to walk (a retiree)
*milk for my kids for a year (mother of four)
*Almost 300 bus tickets for my job search rides (young immigrants)
*Tune-up for old beater that gets us to work each day (Mr+Mrs working poor)
*Laser surgery for cataracts in both eyes (senior)
*Steel-toed boots and a hard hat so I could get a construction job (young man)
*150 jars of jam to go with my peanut butter sandwiches (school girl)
*I could get my prescriptions filled (senior citizen)
*600 presents from the Dollar Store so I’d always have gifts for my family (a “training” wage earner)
*Bannock to feed all the hungry tummies, and blankets for the winter (an elder)
*Decent clothes for my children to wear to school so no one laughs at them (single mom)
*Dinner for 200 people at Union Gospel Mission at Easter (homeless person)
*Brushes and paint (a starving artist)
*600 boxes of Kraft Dinner (a young mom)
*Comfortable shoes for the next 10 years for our poor, tired feet (taxpaying public)
Instead our $600 became some ugly shoes abandoned in a rich woman’s closet.
--M. Kelly Jean Swanson
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
Editor, The News; Tuesday April 4, 2006
Note: I was going to just post excerpts but felt Mr. Gibson deserved the courtesy of his entire letter, so I have highlighted the parts I want to emphasis.
Abbotsford’s residents are living in a city that is trying to be something it’s not.This is not a small town that’s experiencing growing pains. It’s a city. Period. And as a city it needs to have progressive thinkers in charge that can handle city problems and growth.There is no reason why issues time and time again get put on the back burner to be dealt with in the future. The future is now here in Abbotsford, and I believe this city is long overdue for some of the amenities that come with a population base the size of which is here now, and growing rapidly.
We should have an arena the size of which can handle a WHL team, not a BCHL team. Why should Chilliwack be supporting a larger market team in a much smaller market? Other uses for the arena would attract people and money here, not the other way around. A casino? Why not have one here instead of seeing our dollars head elsewhere? The dangers that come with gambling do not simply disappear if an Abby resident gambles in another city. It’s past time for this city to build some sort of entertainment district, clustered close together south of the No.1 highway. This would keep policing costs down, keep young people in town and realistically accessible to taxis as transportation.
This city is a ghost town at night, and it should be a hub to draw people from the smaller cities that surround us. Residents of Chilliwack, Mission and Aldergrove should be feeding our economy, not the other way around. And our 1 o’clock closing times are a joke that gets laughed at by visitors to our city. The people who really want this are long in bed at this hour. Keep our streets safe? Does anyone see the streets as safer since these changes were implemented?
You need big thinkers in a big city, and more tax dollars earned at night would help fund the issues that really are hurting Abbotsford – addiction and homelessness. City in the country? It’s starting to look like East Hastings in the country.
Rodney Gibson Abbotsford BecomingHastings in the country
Abbotsford’s residents are living in a city that is trying to be something it’s not.This is not a small town that’s experiencing growing pains. It’s a city. Period. And as a city it needs to have progressive thinkers in charge that can handle city problems and growth.There is no reason why issues time and time again get put on the back burner to be dealt with in the future. The future is now here in Abbotsford, and I believe this city is long overdue for some of the amenities that come with a population base the size of which is here now, and growing rapidly.
We should have an arena the size of which can handle a WHL team, not a BCHL team. Why should Chilliwack be supporting a larger market team in a much smaller market? Other uses for the arena would attract people and money here, not the other way around. A casino? Why not have one here instead of seeing our dollars head elsewhere? The dangers that come with gambling do not simply disappear if an Abby resident gambles in another city. It’s past time for this city to build some sort of entertainment district, clustered close together south of the No.1 highway. This would keep policing costs down, keep young people in town and realistically accessible to taxis as transportation.
This city is a ghost town at night, and it should be a hub to draw people from the smaller cities that surround us. Residents of Chilliwack, Mission and Aldergrove should be feeding our economy, not the other way around. And our 1 o’clock closing times are a joke that gets laughed at by visitors to our city. The people who really want this are long in bed at this hour. Keep our streets safe? Does anyone see the streets as safer since these changes were implemented?
You need big thinkers in a big city, and more tax dollars earned at night would help fund the issues that really are hurting Abbotsford – addiction and homelessness. City in the country? It’s starting to look like East Hastings in the country.
Rodney Gibson Abbotsford BecomingHastings in the country
Sunday, April 02, 2006
By JOE MILLICANAbbotsford NewsApr 01 2006
Homeless want a patch of land.
A 42-year-old man sifts through his dirty belongings and attempts to drag the leaves and undergrowth over the shelter he created to fend off the winter nights. He was covered and out of sight for a few days and enjoyed some peace and quiet. However, a group of kids has now attacked his temporary home and left it exposed to Abbotsford's police and city bylaw officers. He expects a visit from them any time now, and knows they will likely confiscate his remaining possessions -something he said has happened six times previously - and ask him to move along. However, Kerry Pakarinen is adamant he is going nowhere. And the reason? He says there is nowhere for him to go.
Pakarinen has been living in Abbotsford for the past six months having moved here from Vancouver. He had a home and a job locally, but said an ankle injury and his epilepsy contributed to his downfall and he has been living on Abbotsford's streets for six weeks. Pakarinen currently calls a patch of woodland on Sumas Way. Ironically, Pakarinen is a trained home renovator, and he put those skills to good use by digging a shelter into the side of a hill and reinforcing it with makeshift beams that he found in the woodland. He just wants to be left alone to find a job and get himself on track, but at the moment has more pressing issues. "When I came from East Van I thought I had come to God's country. I have come to the Bible belt but all I have found is the devil," he said.
Despite spending time in a number of communities across Canada, Pakarinen is adamant that Abbotsford is one of the worst for its "treatment of individuals. "People turn a blind eye and look the other way. If they saw they would be shamed by what's going on. "Pakarinen believes he is well-qualified to make such a statement, having been at the forefront of homeless issues in other communities. Acting as a media spokesman at the time, Pakarinen was one of the men behind the high-profile squat in the old Woodward's building in Vancouver in 2002. The protest followed a decision by the B.C. Liberals not to build social housing in the structure, despite a commitment by the previous NDP administration to do so. The City of Vancouver eventually evicted the squatters through the courts and in 2003 bought the Woodwards building from B.C. housing for $5 million. In the summer, it will be made into houses, shops, green space and a post-secondary base for contemporary arts.
Having relocated to Abbotsford, Pakarinen is turning his attention to B.C.'s fifth-largest city.In February, the City of Abbotsford was criticized for elements of its homeless policy. At that time, city officials were accused of "stealing" the personal belongings of some of Abbotsford's street people. In response to that, city spokesman Jay Teichroeb said bylaw officials gave homeless people 48-hours prior warning to shift from a particular area before city crews moved in to "clean it up. "Rather than "pushing around our poor folk," Pakarinen said the city should designate a piece of property for homeless people to pitch their tents. "This has got to be better than chasing people all over the place." he said.
Pakarinen said he does not do drugs, although he does smoke a small amount of marijuana to control his epilepsy. Basically, having been living paycheck to paycheck, he said he simply hit a run of bad luck. "A lot of people out there are hurting and they need the help of their society," he said. "I will be working again. I just need a hand. "I am a pacifist. If you have a fear of me then come and I will make you a cup of coffee. It would be good to hear people's ideas and concerns. Please don't be fearful of me because I am homeless - I am just hurting.
"Abbotsford Mayor George Ferguson said on Thursday that he recognizes homelessness in Abbotsford is a problem. Ferguson was recently approached by local resident Richard Bell, who is pushing to find a patch of land for Abbotsford's homeless to pitch their tents. Bell set a March 31 deadline for that bid, but despite failing within that time frame, he got Ferguson's attention. According to Ferguson, there are provincial and federal issues that need to be addressed when it comes to homelessness, such as attempting to include Abbotsford in the share of money that is currently allocated to the Greater Vancouver Regional District. However, he said the city can also play its part. "We need to find a solution to this homeless situation and figure out how we can deal with," Ferguson said." I will be asking at the next council meeting that we set up a homeless committee to deal with the local problem. The weather is now going to improve, but hopefully we will get something resolved so we do not have this same problem next year. "Bell said he plans to appear before council within the next couple of weeks. "I made it clear that there is going to be a solution to this," he said. "People need to have a place where they can live legally. How that can be achieved is what we have to work on."
A 42-year-old man sifts through his dirty belongings and attempts to drag the leaves and undergrowth over the shelter he created to fend off the winter nights. He was covered and out of sight for a few days and enjoyed some peace and quiet. However, a group of kids has now attacked his temporary home and left it exposed to Abbotsford's police and city bylaw officers. He expects a visit from them any time now, and knows they will likely confiscate his remaining possessions -something he said has happened six times previously - and ask him to move along. However, Kerry Pakarinen is adamant he is going nowhere. And the reason? He says there is nowhere for him to go.
Pakarinen has been living in Abbotsford for the past six months having moved here from Vancouver. He had a home and a job locally, but said an ankle injury and his epilepsy contributed to his downfall and he has been living on Abbotsford's streets for six weeks. Pakarinen currently calls a patch of woodland on Sumas Way. Ironically, Pakarinen is a trained home renovator, and he put those skills to good use by digging a shelter into the side of a hill and reinforcing it with makeshift beams that he found in the woodland. He just wants to be left alone to find a job and get himself on track, but at the moment has more pressing issues. "When I came from East Van I thought I had come to God's country. I have come to the Bible belt but all I have found is the devil," he said.
Despite spending time in a number of communities across Canada, Pakarinen is adamant that Abbotsford is one of the worst for its "treatment of individuals. "People turn a blind eye and look the other way. If they saw they would be shamed by what's going on. "Pakarinen believes he is well-qualified to make such a statement, having been at the forefront of homeless issues in other communities. Acting as a media spokesman at the time, Pakarinen was one of the men behind the high-profile squat in the old Woodward's building in Vancouver in 2002. The protest followed a decision by the B.C. Liberals not to build social housing in the structure, despite a commitment by the previous NDP administration to do so. The City of Vancouver eventually evicted the squatters through the courts and in 2003 bought the Woodwards building from B.C. housing for $5 million. In the summer, it will be made into houses, shops, green space and a post-secondary base for contemporary arts.
Having relocated to Abbotsford, Pakarinen is turning his attention to B.C.'s fifth-largest city.In February, the City of Abbotsford was criticized for elements of its homeless policy. At that time, city officials were accused of "stealing" the personal belongings of some of Abbotsford's street people. In response to that, city spokesman Jay Teichroeb said bylaw officials gave homeless people 48-hours prior warning to shift from a particular area before city crews moved in to "clean it up. "Rather than "pushing around our poor folk," Pakarinen said the city should designate a piece of property for homeless people to pitch their tents. "This has got to be better than chasing people all over the place." he said.
Pakarinen said he does not do drugs, although he does smoke a small amount of marijuana to control his epilepsy. Basically, having been living paycheck to paycheck, he said he simply hit a run of bad luck. "A lot of people out there are hurting and they need the help of their society," he said. "I will be working again. I just need a hand. "I am a pacifist. If you have a fear of me then come and I will make you a cup of coffee. It would be good to hear people's ideas and concerns. Please don't be fearful of me because I am homeless - I am just hurting.
"Abbotsford Mayor George Ferguson said on Thursday that he recognizes homelessness in Abbotsford is a problem. Ferguson was recently approached by local resident Richard Bell, who is pushing to find a patch of land for Abbotsford's homeless to pitch their tents. Bell set a March 31 deadline for that bid, but despite failing within that time frame, he got Ferguson's attention. According to Ferguson, there are provincial and federal issues that need to be addressed when it comes to homelessness, such as attempting to include Abbotsford in the share of money that is currently allocated to the Greater Vancouver Regional District. However, he said the city can also play its part. "We need to find a solution to this homeless situation and figure out how we can deal with," Ferguson said." I will be asking at the next council meeting that we set up a homeless committee to deal with the local problem. The weather is now going to improve, but hopefully we will get something resolved so we do not have this same problem next year. "Bell said he plans to appear before council within the next couple of weeks. "I made it clear that there is going to be a solution to this," he said. "People need to have a place where they can live legally. How that can be achieved is what we have to work on."
